Marine Pollution ControlMarine Pollution Control
8631 West Jefferson Avenue
Detroit, MI 48209 USA
313.849.2333 - 24/hour

11320 E Lakewood Blvd., #11
Holland, MI 49424
800-521-8232 – 24/Hour

GSA Contract #: GS-10F-0268R
Need help using GSA?  Click here.

Now that Coal Companies are Troubled, Who Should Pay for Environmental Cleanups?

August 25, 2016

Coal companies are going dark. They are economically troubled, with nearly all of them experiencing bankruptcy or emerging from it in a different form. The reasons are numerous and depending one’s view, can range from depleted coal seams to less demand to strict environmental regulations.
Regardless of how their troubles started, coal companies still have to clean up their sites. But the companies are bankrupt, which leads to the question of just who is going to pay. 

Read More: 

OSHA 1910.120 40 Hour HAZWOPER Course

Marine Pollution Control is offering an OSHA 1910.120 40 Hour HAZWOPER Course beginning on Monday, September 19, 2016. Additionally for those who would need a refresher course (8-hour, 24-hour and 40-hour), this will also be offered on Monday, September 19, 2016. For more information, please call (313) 849-2674 or e-mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

U.S. states agreed to keep Exxon climate-deception probe secret: here's why


As far back as the 1970s, Exxon conducted research that confirmed the occurrence of climate change—and that burning fossil fuels is a major contributor to it.
But the company—now ExxonMobil—largely kept that research under wraps, while funding campaigns that denied the science of climate change for decades.
This deception came to light last year, triggering multiple state-level investigations into the oil giant.
In early May, 15 states signed a pact that forms the basis of a joint investigation into whether ExxonMobil deliberately misled the public by contradicting research from its own scientists.
That agreement includes a provision that seeks to keep prosecutors' deliberations secret, but is also broadly written so that investigations may be expanded to other fossil-fuel companies, reports Reuters, which examined a copy of the document.

Coast Guard demonstrates cold weather oil response technology


The Coast Guard Research and Development Center, located in New London, Connecticut, and the crew of Coast Guard Cutter Juniper worked throughout the week to demonstrate and evaluate new technologies to use when responding to oil spills in harsh cold weather environments.

The technologies include a prototype ice cage to keep ice away from an oil skimmer as it collects spilled oil from the water’s surface, a temporary storage device for collected oil that can be mounted on the deck of a vessel, and methods to decontaminate personnel who have been working in an oiled environment.

"The lessons we've demonstrated here and in the other tests clearly illustrate the feasibility of using technology to solve the issues surrounding oil spill cleanup in ice conditions,” said Kurt Hansen, a project manager at the Coast Guard Research and Development Center.   “The ice cage, for instance, has been shown to be a valuable tool for keeping ice away from oil skimmers, keeping their brushes clear and working more efficiently.”

Read More:

Tugboat engineers accused of polluting Lake Huron


Absorbent diapers, a garden hose and a blue bucket were just some of the tools used in a scheme to dump oily bilge water from a Great Lakes tugboat into Lake Huron, causing a slick spotted from the air that was twice the length of a football field.
And now, two engineers from the tug Victory are accused of conspiring to discharge the oil-contaminated water into Lake Huron and other areas of the Great Lakes. They're also accused of releasing the dirty water at night to make it difficult to detect the resulting sheen.
According to a federal grand jury indictment handed up last month, Jeffrey Patrick, chief engineer aboard the Victory, and William Harrigan, first assistant engineer, allegedly released the oily water into Lake Huron from mid-May 2014 through the end of that June. The indictment does not say when or where other discharges occurred.